close

Talent

The Link Between Direct Sourcing and Talent Sustainability

Direct SourcingTalent by Christopher J. Dwyer on

Many HR, talent acquisition, and contingent workforce program leaders overlook particular phases of direct sourcing, especially talent curation and segmentation, since they have been conditioned to manage their processes within the confines of a traditional contingent workforce management (CWM) initiative that follows more procurement-oriented procedures (i.e., supply management, heavy cost focus, etc.). Even under a centralized CWM program, the most critical direct sourcing strategies and capabilities require more time, focus, and resources than what is typically available with non-employee workforce management.

For example, talent curation is a critical piece to the direct sourcing puzzle and is considered crucial to the entire hierarchy of the process. In a direct sourcing program, recruiting expertise (via an MSP, talent curation partner, etc.) curates talent for the business, ultimately helping its client build a deep talent cloud or community using a series of augmented approaches, including branded job portals, targeted ads and recruitment marketing campaigns, and artificial intelligence-led candidate matching. The solution that is leading the direct sourcing program can also leverage the organization’s brand power to attract potential candidates, as well.

While some enterprises maintain deep pools of talent that are more “general” in scope, these may not be effective from an agile workforce perspective. Organizations typically overlook talent pool segmentation and maintain a single repository of talent pool candidates; this failure to segment is a missed opportunity to build a nimbler approach to finding candidates based on geography, skillset, role, etc. Talent pool segmentation enables enterprises to better “organize” their candidates for easier, faster, and better alignment with future requirements, as well.

A typical first step in talent community segmentation is to conduct due diligence around candidate skillsets, past work history, compensation, proficiency, and overall enterprise hiring alignment. Segmentation is what allows a business to be more dynamic in how it addresses its talent needs. It also answers many current sourcing challenges while fostering relationships with candidates with emerging and new skillsets or expertise.

By spending more time in the initial phases of direct sourcing (and, subsequently, executing consistent maintenance of internal talent communities/pools), businesses are able to build a more seamless bridge to “talent sustainability,” which the Future of Work Exchange defines as a by-product of leveraging workforce solutions (such as extended workforce technology, VMS, etc.), direct sourcing channels, and both private and public talent communities, etc. to build self-sustaining outlets of talent that 1) map to evolving skills requirements across the enterprise given product development and the progression of the greater organization, 2) reflect existing expertise and skillsets across the enterprise that can be leveraged for real-time utilization, and, 3) allow hiring managers and other talent-led executives to leverage nurture and candidate experience strategies to ensure that all networked workers are amiable and open to reengagement for new and/or continued projects and initiatives.

The Great Resignation has become more volatile, and with its wide-sweeping ramifications playing critical roles in how enterprises structure their workforce in the second half of the year, it is crucial that strategies such as direct sourcing contribute to overall talent scalability. Leveraging the power of direct sourcing’s key elements (and associated technology) can assist businesses in maximizing the positive elements of the “Talent Revolution” and parlay them into means of attracting the best-fit, highest-quality talent. Talent sustainability will be the way businesses thrive in the near future…and direct sourcing is a direct link to get them there.

read more

The Link Between Diversity and Direct Sourcing

Direct SourcingTalent by Christopher J. Dwyer on

Today, diversity is no longer a “check-a-box” factor for many enterprises around the world; rather, it has become a cultural movement within business that emphasizes the depth of talent pools, talent communities, and talent networks without bias or barriers. The truth regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion (DE&I) is that direct sourcing programs (and extended workforce/contingent workforce programs) that are diverse tend to be more successful. If businesses can embed a spirit of inclusion within their direct sourcing processes and act in accordance with this mindset, they can broaden the existing talent landscape and improve upon it with new ideas and opportunity.

And, while established diversity programs previously existed in many enterprises, the events and civil unrest of the past two years have driven many businesses to develop and communicate more purpose-driven goals which are linked to societal, economic, technological, and sustainable shifts. To achieve these goals, a large number of businesses are trying to harness the power of a diverse workforce.

The Future of Work Exchange has long progressed the notion of “Direct Sourcing 2.0,” in which traditional direct sourcing phases and operations are “supercharged” to transform this strategy into a repeatable and scalable (not to mention more digitized) series of processes that can drive true talent sustainability:

As the overall labor market evolves in the wake of rising worker resignations, smart businesses will prioritize the need for deeper assessment and validation of skillsets and place a greater emphasis on the candidate and hiring manager experience. The starting point for most will be to build on their existing direct sourcing capabilities and work to develop Direct Sourcing 2.0 capabilities.

Simply put: much like the greater Future of Work movement, there is so much more to this than just automation and technology. Direct Sourcing 2.0 isn’t just a scalable strategy that is driven by next-generation software, but a program that relies on both technology and humanity to be successful in the face of an evolving labor market.

Layering DE&I into direct sourcing is about changing behaviors and removing hiring barriers and unconscious bias from talent engagement and talent acquisition. Utilizing technology to help guide and enforce a new mindset can be extremely valuable and create awareness that the deepest talent pools are diverse talent pools. Using direct sourcing to hire diverse talent gives HR teams a direct ability to link purpose with DE&I efforts. For example, businesses can opt to tap into professional networks that were already designed for diverse workers from various backgrounds, cultures, and genders and link these to talent curation efforts. Direct sourcing initiatives can also benefit from “diversity automation” that is enabled from direct sourcing platforms that have partnerships and integrations with diverse job boards and networks. They can also offer anonymizing functionality that can hide specific information about different candidates.

Diversity, as stated above, is more than just an objective; it is a facet of the new world of work that sparks new ideas, catalyzes innovation, and enables a business with the necessary skillsets and expertise to thrive in changing times. Direct sourcing, then, can be an effective gateway in developing a more diverse workforce.

read more

“Perceptive Hiring” is the Future of Work

Talent by Christopher J. Dwyer on

The world of talent will never be the same. Entering Year Three of a pandemic that has transformed the way we all think about both business and our personal lives, the average enterprise cannot leverage what are now archaic means of hiring to find the necessary skillsets and expertise to thrive in an increasingly globalized corporate arena.

The Great Resignation continues unabated. The Talent Revolution is at hand, with workers across the world becoming more aware of their desire for flexibility, empathy, and purpose. Although unemployment is at a near-53-year low, businesses are finding it harder than ever to fill both tactical and strategic roles.

The hard truth we face as business leaders is this: it doesn’t matter how much we increase compensation or how many additional perks are bult into job offers. Workers today need more than “smart hiring” strategies for reachout, engagement, and negotiations. Those attributes that were mentioned above (flexibility, empathy, and purpose) are not going to be streamlined within what we call smart hiring.

We need more…so much more.

Enterprises today are flush with data and information. This is a critical, “table stakes” aspect of the new world of work, as the ability to harness powerful data from VMS, ATS, CRM, HRIS, direct sourcing, and other platform sources enable hiring managers and other business leaders with “smarter” talent engagement and talent acquisition capabilities. Advanced technology today provides executives with the necessary intelligence to understand who the best candidate may be for a particular role and project (by analyzing work history, expertise, skillsets, certifications, etc.), augmenting with additional data (such as diversity information) to present an ideal professional that should be hired.

In essence, this has always been a goal of “total talent management,” in which the very realm of total talent intelligence (gleaned from both contingent and FTE workforce management systems) assists hiring managers to make quicker decisions based on the knowledge of the company’s overall talent pool.

The above aspects (total talent, diversity, skillsets, expertise, etc.) are all complementary pieces to the new era of workforce engagement. Businesses frankly cannot survive in a truly disruptive labor market without these modes of talent intelligence, given that staffing shortages have become an unfortunate norm.

However, back to the point above about “needing more”: if we think about how far we’ve come in regards to splicing data into talent engagement, how innovative artificial intelligence and machine learning have come, and just how advanced our workforce management software systems are, it’s pretty incredible to think that we don’t have to spend days analyzing resumes and pontificating about the qualities of dozens of candidates for a single job. All of that work has been automated and augmented (the Future of Work, right?). If we could just take that a step further, take those processes and embed even more data and insights…what would happen?

We’d transform “smart hiring” into “perceptive hiring,” in which more than just workforce history, skillsets, and expertise factor into a candidate being matched to a job or position. There are so many factors that play into the human elements of today’s business professionals, including their soft skills, workplace preferences, culture, and other elements of candidates as people and not just profiles on a screen.

How can we ensure that 1) the candidate will adapt and/or evolve to the enterprise’s culture, or, 2) that the business is a great cultural fit for the candidate? It’s not a one-way street anymore; we’re in the middle of a Talent Revolution that has resulted in workers becoming the gatekeepers to their own professional futures. We’d perceive more from the candidates and their personas beyond the traditional measures of hiring. We need to continue thinking about the best possible ways to find and retain key talent, especially in the face of The Great Resignation, however, we should also want our workforce to be a product of, well, more.

Four-plus million people have been voluntarily leaving their jobs since October of last year…and it’s not just a compensation issue. Workers are humans, and humans can suffer from burnout, anxiety, and a lack of engagement with positions that don’t satisfy a larger purpose. The pandemic and its fallout changed many of us, changed the way we think, operate, and, most importantly, speculate about the future. Candidates want more than a well-paying gig…they want work with a purpose that satisfies something deeper.

If we could leverage AI, next-gen analytics, and new innovations to spark a deeper perception of candidates, we would have the ability to solve talent retention issues and ensure that the workforce was tethered to a workplace culture (as well as the work itself) that met these necessities. This profound perception of candidates, linked to the smart hiring strategies and technology we have today, will become a way to develop and foster a strong, engaged workforce in the face of evolving times.

In essence, perceptive hiring is not “this worker is the ideal fit for this role,” but rather “this person is the ideal fit for this role.”

read more

Talent Quality-Led Recruiting and the Future of Work

Talent by Christopher J. Dwyer on

“Talent quality” can be a nebulous concept. Staffing organizations often have to balance the many innerworkings of such an idea, delicately balancing the intricacies of what they believe “talent quality” to be. In a business world that has been dramatically transformed by a pandemic, changes in how businesses operate, and, of course, the impact of Future of Work accelerants, today’s enterprises, staffing agencies, and other key groups must be focused on broadening the definitions around talent quality and put those at the heart of any extended workforce management program.

The Future of Work Exchange is excited to partner with Glider.ai for an exclusive Q&A event tomorrow (May 5) at 11am ET. Ben Walker, a longtime thought leader and expert in the workforce solutions industry, will join me to discuss:

  • The impact of talent quality-led recruiting and how these strategies should be developed and executed.
  • How artificial intelligence can be a gamechanger in regards to eradicating talent fraud and improving overall candidate quality.
  • The priorities of today’s extended workforce programs, and;
  • The key KPIs and performance metrics that are required to gauge the impact of talent quality programs.

Click here or on the image below to register for tomorrow’s event. Looking forward to seeing you there!

read more

When Will “The Greatest Resignation” Become “The Great Resettling”?

Talent by Christopher J. Dwyer on

When we take a 30,000-foot purview of what’s happening right now regarding “The Great Resignation,” it looks pretty dire: nearly four-plus million workers have left their positions each month since October of last year. Not counting numbers for March (which have not yet been announced by the Bureau of Labor Statistics), that’s nearly 16 million people who have resigned, quit, etc. over a four-month period.

Economist Arindrajit Dube recently sparked an interesting discussion on why he believes that The Great Resignation is more of a “Great Reshuffling,” given that data points to workers’ resignations concentrated in industries such as retail, restaurants, hospitality, mining and logging, etc. And, interestingly enough, just last week, he tweeted:

There is no Great Resignation … people are not leaving the workforce. Prime-age employment rate is back to 2019 levels! What we have is a Great Reshuffling: workers moving to better paying jobs. That’s what a competitive labor market actually looks like!

So, if we were to agree with Dube, the approach towards what’s happening right now would look something like this: workers, unhappy with wages, left their positions en masse for better compensation, creating a “weird” labor market that is now competitive compared to the disconcerted workforce foundation that we experienced earlier in the pandemic.

I’m not one to disagree with a talented economist who bases his public insights on hard data. However, I’d like to throw some additional thoughts onto the pile to reflect some of the other influences on The Great/Greatest Resignation. For one, Dube’s only miss in his statement is that there’s so much more to resignations than compensation. In fact, we’ve talked about them (at-length!) here at the Future of Work Exchange. Purposeful work, flexibility, remote and hybrid work options, etc.…these are absolutely critical facets that contribute to the ongoing, massive numbers of resignations.

What many pundits seem to be getting at in their messaging is this: why is the labor market so competitive even though 16 million workers (not including those who had done so in March) left their positions voluntarily over the past several months? Is The Great Resignation even real?

Well, yes, it is. We just cannot argue with the fact that millions of people left their roles; the numbers are there to prove that. It’s what’s happening after the resignations that is so vitally important. This is where I feel what is happening is more of a “Great Resettling” rather than a “Great Reshuffling,” as workers who have left their jobs are “resettling” themselves within a different dynamic.

Economist Dean Baker brought up an interesting point in an article from a few weeks ago, stating, “The number of people who reported being self-employed (both incorporated and unincorporated) in March was 618,000 above the average for 2019. The fact that self-employment remains high, even as the labor market has tightened enormously, indicates that self-employment is a choice rather than an act of desperation.” (Future of Work Exchange research discovered this, as well, back in the summer of 2021: 43% of the workforce was considered “non-employee” before the pandemic and increased to over 47% during it.)

The word “choice” in that statement means all of the difference between “reshuffling” and “resettling.” A great reshuffle, at least to me, would mean that workers are moving in vastly different pathways than they were in pre-pandemic times. A great resettlement means that:

  • Those who were of retirement age during the pandemic but didn’t want to retire will make the choice to do so out of either necessity or for the sake of health and safety.
  • More and more workers will adopt a flexible, contingent-led career pathway that afforded them the ability to be independent.
  • Professionals who reached a breaking point with their current organizations’ lack of employee engagement (and flexible work models) will seek culture over compensation.
  • Tens of thousands of workers have started (and will continue to launch) their own companies to take advantage of an entrepreneur’s market, and;
  • “Digital nomads,” who wanted to leave major metropolitan areas and had the flexibility to work remotely because their industries supported it, will easily adopt new work structures wherever they want to be.

Figuratively, the “dust is settling” right now. If the March resignation numbers mimic those of November, December, January, and February, we’re still operating in Greatest Resignation mode, with workers about to rethink their future pathways aiming for a more settled foundation for the second half of 2022.

Actually, today, professionals are settling into positions that satisfy long-desired urges, including flexibility, empathy, and purpose. The Great Resettling seems to be a more on-the-nose phrase to use, since it encapsulates the ways workers are settling into extended/contingent roles, independent positions, and solo-preneur/entrepreneur ventures.

read more

Direct Sourcing 2.0 and the Hiring Manager Experience

Direct SourcingTalent by Christopher J. Dwyer on

Beyond deeper and more meaningful candidate relationships, direct sourcing allows a business to leverage (and manage) its culture and brand to attract recruits that are easily engaged for future projects and initiatives. Hearing long-employed (and loyal) HR and business professionals discuss the traits and culture of their organization is a more significant and credible way to learn about a potential employer than through the words of a recruiter with a commission on the line. The informal testimonials of the internal hiring teams can effectively build engagement and ultimately, worker loyalty.

While the talent curation part of direct sourcing typically takes time to develop, most organizations possess an innate ability to identify strong cultural fits and highly-desirable skillsets. Additionally, the ability of internal recruiters, HR, and hiring managers to collaborate and tailor job searches to a unique team, manager, project, or location is unmatched when dealing with outside recruiters.

The level of nuance can be akin to the difference between a surgeon and a butcher. The ability to increase recruiting precision can be particularly valuable when businesses are managing specific diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.

Given the current challenges to find and retain top talent, leading HR organizations are investing in ways to improve the “candidate experience” (similar to the “customer experience”), where every aspect is designed to be positive, engaging, and beneficial to the recruit.

In a market where the candidate holds more power than ever before, compensation and benefits, employment perks, AND the employer’s credentials (i.e., brand, culture, vision, values, etc.) can play a major role in attracting a qualified candidates. This will continue to be true as an increasing number of candidates are incorporating their personal views on an organization’s culture and brand into their decision-making.

While the candidate experience is critical, the hiring manager experience should also be considered. Hiring managers are often on the front lines of the war for talent and must account for:

  • The specific needs of each role, position, and project.
  • The intricate requirements of a multifaceted talent acquisition strategy that balances direct hire, job boards, talent marketplaces, staffing suppliers, etc.
  • The necessary data and intelligence to make faster, more educated talent and hiring decisions.
  • The proper balance between the human touch, automation, and third-party services, etc. that can be used to find, engage, and source high-quality talent.

Traditional recruitment is not typically seen as scalable due to the manual work often associated with it, while direct sourcing relies heavily on hiring teams to drive activity, scalability, and value. Just as HR leaders are realizing that candidates should be treated like customers, hiring managers also need an experience that is seamless and boundaryless.

Business and HR leaders must also arm their hiring managers with the necessary resources, technologies, and capabilities to effectively tap into different talent pools without the worry of internal barriers or archaic inertia. To achieve this, digitization of key direct sourcing processes is vital.

read more

Are We Finally Ready to Take On Total Talent Management?

Talent by Christopher J. Dwyer on

Over a decade ago, I developed one of the staffing and HR industry’s first full-scale research studies on total talent management (TTM), the programmatic concept that entails blending HR, procurement, and talent acquisition competencies under a single umbrella to find, source, engage, and manage both FTE and non-employee talent. Total talent management, by definition, requires this functional convergence on top of integrations between core workforce management systems and solutions, like VMS, ATS, RPO, and HRIS.

While total talent management has long sounded ideal on paper, its adoption has never really taken off in the 10+ years I’ve been writing and researching the program and its innerworkings. In any given year from 2012 up until late 2021, less than 15% of organizations had some semblance of total talent-like capabilities, which include consistent procurement and HR/talent acquisition collaboration, some integrations between HR and workforce systems, and converged talent intelligence (a miniscule percentage, perhaps less than 2%, have a fully-fledged program that has been in place for multiple years).

The typical knock on total talent management is that the two sides of the talent coin (FTEs and non-employees) represent two very different sets of guidelines and strategies. A standard criticism is that an organization would never apply core human capital approaches such as learning management and succession planning to its contingent workforce, nor would they cross any lines that would violate federal and regulatory policies concerning relationships with independent contractors and freelance talent.

At this point, nearly a third of the way through 2022, shouldn’t we be ready to take on total talent management given the vast transformations across the world of talent and work?

Last year, the Future of Work Exchange highlighted how total talent intelligence was an excellent “gateway” into the realm of total talent management:

“Thinking about integrations, cross-functional coordination, blending core HR and contingent workforce management competencies, etc. can be maddening, for sure. This is why, especially in today’s strange business world, enterprises should consider taking a much more streamlined path and prioritize total talent intelligence as an initial cornerstone for what could blossom into full-blown total talent management in the months and years to come. In essence, total talent intelligence gleans valuable worker-based insights from both FTEs and non-employees by harnessing collective data from Human Resources Information Systems (HRIS), Vendor Management Systems (VMS), time and attendance solutions, Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS), Freelancer Management System (FMS), and similar platforms to gain the deepest possible view into an organization’s total talent pool.”

If total talent intelligence remained a viable “first step” into total talent management given the transformation of work and talent, shouldn’t the next logical step entail working closer to developing a true TTM program? Consider that:

  • Talent retainment and talent attraction have become top-of-mind issues in a Great Resignation-fueled, Talent Revolution-led labor market. Workers, no matter if they are searching for a full-time or freelance gig, are after purposeful and meaningful work in a workplace culture that is inclusive and flexible. Total talent management in 2022 can be an effective means of ensuring that all workers, no matter the type, are attracted to the organization and want to stay once they are there. The convergence of HR and talent acquisition principles, combined with the power of procurement-led contingent workforce management, can ensure that consistent tactics are utilized in talent engagement efforts to put culture, brand, and similar attributes at the forefront.
  • The commodity-driven days of extended workforce management are over. Procurement will always have a sustainable role in managing the extended workforce, however, the era of “commodity-led” measures has passed us by, replaced by a visionary approach that values skillsets and expertise over costs and budgets.
  • A remote and distributed workforce requires more structure. In the early days of the pandemic, executive leaders found themselves unable to effectively track their total workforce in the wake of a “remote overnight” switch. Although the rigor behind workforce management has vastly improved since then, the vast majority of enterprises are still offering flexible workforce options for their staff and require more enhanced means of understanding where workers are, what they are working on, and how to address skills gaps if a business location requires a new infusion of talent.
  • The focus on workplace culture permeates into the world of extended workforce management. While we know that there’s a barrier we cannot cross in regards to treating non-employees like FTEs, there is an arena in which the same cultural benefits of a positive and engaging workplace for traditional employees is just as attractive to freelance, independent, and extended talent. Aspects such as enterprise-wide communication, transparency into operations and projects, and “flexibility for all” can go a long way into ensuring that extended talent is not only attracted to the enterprise but will also want to be a part of that organization’s community even after their engagements end.

Total talent management has long been a concept that bordered on the theoretical. In years past, there was an industry-wide acceptance that the many intricacies of the program could not effectively work together; however, in the past two years, the world of work and talent has been transformed. Total talent management should be considered a viable and powerful way to merge the contingent workforce, HR, and talent acquisition competencies, capabilities, and technologies required to attract and retain talent, as well as manage that talent effectively on a global and remote scale.

read more

“The Greatest Resignation” Means We Need to Start Thinking Differently About the Workforce

Business LeadershipTalent by Christopher J. Dwyer on

“Find joy in everything you choose to do. Every job, relationship, home… it’s your responsibility to love it, or change it.” – Chuck Palahniuk, Best-Selling Author

For months now, “The Great Resignation” has been dominating headlines, thought leadership, workforce news, and all of the appropriate responses to the transformation of talent and work. By now, we know the stakes: millions of workers are voluntarily leaving their jobs for a variety of reasons, all of which prove that there’s more to life (and work!) than just cold, hard cash.

The Future of Work Exchange has been covering this topic for months, encouraging business leaders to think about The Great Resignation from a different perspective, that of a “Talent Revolution.” So it goes, the foundational elements of what’s also being called “The Big Quit” revolve around the concepts of purpose, career journeys, and alignment between a human and his/her/their work. Too, aspects like better working conditions, inclusive workplace culture, and, yes, of course, compensation, are all driving factors of the revolution happening right in front of us.

So, given all of this, when does The Great Resignation end? Well, it seems we’re heading in the opposite direction. Let’s just call it The Greatest Resignation, because:

  • Last Tuesday, the U.S. Department of Labor announced that nearly 4.4 million Americans quit their jobs in February.
  • Better than January? Oh, gosh no. This was 100,000 more resignations than the U.S. experienced in January, and…
  • …it’s also perilously close to The Great Resignation’s prestigious world record, set with 4.5 million resignations in November 2021.

“Great” has become “Greatest” as this phenomenon marches on. We’re supposed to be living in a “let’s just deal with it” phase of the pandemic, so shouldn’t that mean all of those aspects of business disruption, including staffing shortages and massive resignations, start to curtail as we move towards our so-called “new normal”?

In an article on CNBC, Daniel Zhao, senior economist at Glassdoor, said that “These quits are still extremely high, and that shows the Great Resignation is still in full swing,” and that “It wouldn’t be a surprise to see that cool down in 2022,” Zhao said. “But that’s not to say we should expect the Great Resignation to disappear overnight.”

So, in essence, it’s a hiring purgatory, isn’t it? For now, it certainly seems like it. However, just perceiving all of this with a different mindset is the first, and most crucial, step in moving out of this unique period in business (and staffing) history.

Here’s the wake-up call: no matter the level of benefits nor the amount of compensation, a business cannot effectively fulfill a worker’s ultimate aspirations without purposeful and meaningful work. There must be a catalyst that drives that realm of joy within a professional’s heart and mind. The Great Resignation is not a fight over money, nor is it a sign that workers have become greedier and are asking for the moon.

This all simply means one thing: the pandemic has shaped our lives in such a way that the personal and professional dichotomy has become intertwined. Workers are people and people are workers. They want purpose. They want joy. They want to earn a living (a nice living) while doing something they love.

There’s a critical reason why we should be looking at The Greatest Resignation much differently. It’s not a war of attrition nor a battle for higher wages, but rather a revolution in which humans are doing everything they can to align their purpose, culture, and journey with the many, many hours they spend at work.

read more

Where Does the Extended Workforce Go From Here?

Talent by Christopher J. Dwyer on

The Future of Work is many things: technology, transformation, work optimization, innovation, collaboration, and, of course, talent. Depending on who you’re talking to, the Future of Work movement’s nexus could be defined as any of those previous attributes, and rightfully so: technology and innovation drive the optimization of how work is done, while the transformation of business leadership translates into an enhanced ability to retain top talent while attracting new skillsets and expertise.

The extended workforce has long been a critical realm within the concept of the Future of Work, fueling a strategic approach towards talent management that has a variety of key benefits ranging from shorter-term engagement, more focused projects and initiatives, access to the world’s deepest skillsets, and the traditional cost savings that have long been associated with this type of labor.

And, speaking of the “traditional” aspects of the extended workforce: the Future of Work Exchange defines this talent as the natural evolution of the contingent workforce, meaning that, at its core, this workforce is still comprised of non-employee talent, however, its impact, value, flexibility, purpose, and accessibility have all progressed to become key elements of the Future of Work movement (even more so than ever before).

There has been so much transformation over the past two-plus years regarding the way work is done, from the absolute domination of remote and hybrid work to massive changes within the realm of business and executive leadership. We’re now two years deep into a pandemic that is finally (hopefully?) just beginning its escape from its “emergency” phase into one that is, again, hopefully more livable. Other aspects of the Future of Work, specifically changes in leadership and the realm of innovation and new tech, have clear pathways ahead of them.

The question remains, then: where does the extended workforce go from here?

The extended workforce of 2022 and beyond is a force that will continue to grow in size, scope, impact, and value. Future of Work Exchange research pegs contingent labor at 47% of the average company’s total workforce, a statistic that is only expected to grow in the months and years ahead. When we’re talking about nearly half of all talent that is found, engaged, and sourced via this realm, we’re essentially discussing a critical piece of the Future of Work puzzle that should be considered the contemporary nexus of all things related to how work is addressed and done.

Consider that business leaders are experiencing the most volatile labor market of their careers, with a dearth of options for filling critical positions as The Great Resignation continues its rampage. And, too, the Talent Revolution is becoming more of a reality for enterprises as workers fight for better conditions, more flexibility, and enhanced benefits. The extended workforce already sits within the crucial inner-workings of the Future of Work movement and will continue to drive value if enterprises:

  • Leverage the extended workforce as a primary means of getting work done.
  • Transform the “hiring manager experience” to make it simpler and easier to align enterprise needs with open talent across talent pools, talent communities, supplier networks, and alternative talent channels.
  • Harness the inherent flexibility of the extended workforce to navigate a challenging, evolving, and frustrating labor market.
  • Utilize total talent intelligence to configure how the extended workforce will influence future hiring initiatives, and;
  • Lean on the extended workforce’s top-tier skillsets and expertise to “future-proof” the greater enterprise at scale.

Perhaps the most interesting facet of today’s extended workforce is the fact that technology and innovation are abound: only several years ago, the technology landscape for managing the contingent workforce focused more on the tactical elements of this realm of talent. Today, it’s a much different story.

Platforms like Utmost are bringing a Future of Work-first focus to how business leverage their non-employee workforce to get work done. Beeline continues to progress its technology to match the evolving needs of HR, procurement, and talent acquisition practitioners. PRO Unlimited (who just made another major move this week) continues to expand its innovative platform philosophy. Prosperix just unveiled its VMS Network solution, which seamlessly connects businesses, talent suppliers, and job candidates together in its unique ecosystem. VMS solutions like Eqip, VectorVMS, FlexTrack, Pixid, and ELEVATE are also offering technological differentiators to the extended workforce solutions marketplace.

WorkSuite has a powerful engine from its Shortlist days (and a business outcome-focused variety of technology), while once-traditional talent marketplaces such as Upwork, Toptal, Bluecrew, and Talmix offer enterprise-grade innovations that represent the fluidity, flexibility, and long-range strengths of the extended workforce and freelance talent.

read more

The Future of Work Exchange Meets the “Off the Cuff” Podcast: A Conversation About “The Great Resignation”

Talent by Christopher J. Dwyer on

I had the pleasure of joining SSI People’s Off the Cuff podcast to chat about the Future of Work, “The Great Resignation,” the “Talent Revolution,” and so much more related to the evolving world of work and talent. Hosted by SSI’s Christina Vinson, it was a delight to chat about these topics with EVP of Strategy and Development at SSI, Manny Vidal.

read more
1 … 8 9 10 11 12 … 19
Page 10 of 19