Hoping that the Future of Work Exchange‘s readers, community, and partners enjoy the Great North American Eclipse today.
Uncategorized
Our “Talent Expert Series” on FOWX features podcast excerpts of today’s Future of Work thought leaders who appear on The Future of Work Exchange Podcast. The series continues with an excerpt from Season 7, Episode 14 featuring Jen Torney, Global Vice President of Client Experience and Partnerships for Talent Solution TAPFIN, and Brian Hoffmeyer, SVP of Market Strategies for Beeline, as they discuss talent trends and strategies for 2024.
Click to listen to the full interview. Note that this excerpt has been edited for readability.
Chris Dwyer: Jen and Brian, thank you so much for joining me today. Before we jump into 2024, what surprised you most about 2023?
Brian Hoffmeyer: Good question. It means you think we’ve been doing this for so long that nothing surprises us anymore. One interesting thing is that Beeline is pushing heavily into what we call the mid-market, which are smaller companies with under a billion in corporate revenue. What’s been surprising and educational are the needs of mid-market companies and how similar they are to larger enterprises we’ve worked with around contingent labor. The mid-market is using more contingent labor and looking to balance cost, quality, and how long it takes to find people. So, there are similarities there. Equally interesting is how the mid-market is looking for this very turnkey, fast-to-deploy, nimble solution. That’s been very educational for everyone.
Jen Torney: Those are great points, Brian. Two things surprised me most. The first was a disappointment. With the legislation we saw in 2023 around affirmative action and the pace of change around diversity, the attention toward it is evolving. Thankfully, there are a lot of champions in the industry making sure there’s still a focus on diversity.
The second was the chaos of the economy and the impact on our clients’ workforces. There were layoffs, then rehiring, then layoffs. It’s never been that unpredictable. It was a lot of change, which shouldn’t be all that surprising with the last couple of years we’ve had. But the unpredictability that happened was interesting.
CD: As we move through 2024, what are your biggest predictions for the year?
BH: We’re going to see real total talent management start to happen and I’m excited about that. I also believe we’re going to see an AI correction if you will, where companies are realizing that the providers they’re relying on are not using AI in the right way and exposing them to risk. And because areas like large language models (LLMs) are growing so quickly in a variety of industries, we can expect some form of regulation put around them. This is already occurring in the EU.
JT: I couldn’t agree more on the AI aspect. There’s a sort of false understanding of what providers are even doing with AI. There’s a lot of hyperbole. In terms of predictions, I’m going to throw my hat in the ring and say there won’t be a recession … but maybe a slow recovery. I may very well be wrong. It might still be a tricky year. I do think there’s going to be more mergers and acquisitions activity. We’re already seeing some acquisitions. In this type of economy, with the 2023 books closed, there will be more acquisitions in the market.
CD: I have dual questions here. Where do both technology and services go in 2024? We’ll begin with Jen and managed services.
JT: I’ll be so bold as to say some of the work we’ve been doing with our partners, Beeline specifically, will begin to converge and intertwine with what we do with our core technology partners. Some of the direction that MSPs are going is becoming more outcome-based focused and less processing management. We have so much expertise to lend and truly believe that organizations are seeking advisory direction and support — particularly on supply and procurement strategy. In addition to recommending a supplier, it’s more about how you are buying and understanding the right strategy to engage and achieve the most value for what you’re trying to drive toward. That’s going to be a big but slow shift.
BH: We’ve started this evolution of who Beeline is because of the new things we have rolling out. We have products that are available to serve parts of the market we have never had before. That will continue. It’s part of what we want to be, which is offering great experiences and products for every persona involved in contingent labor. We’re already doing that with Beeline Professional, our solution for the mid-market, as well as some of the work we’re doing with suppliers that I’m incredibly excited about.
CD: We’ve talked about what surprised us and some 2024 predictions. Let’s close with what each of you would to see most in 2024 — not what you expect to happen — but what you would most like to see.
JT: I have two. The first is I’d like to see Beeline top its 80s party from the CWS Summit. Very much looking forward to that. My real honest answer, and not to sound beauty pageantry, is I’d love to see more world peace. 2023 was a volatile year concerning civil unrest. There’s nothing more I’d like to see than some of that quiet down. I know that’s probably not realistic to see it completely resolved, but that’s my utopian answer.
BH: Challenge accepted for the Beeline party. My answer was going to be similar. The word I’d use is normalcy. We had two-and-a-half years of the pandemic. And 2023 with economic uncertainty, the war in Ukraine for the last few years, and what’s going on in Gaza. We’re now in a year of a political presidential election cycle that’s going to be horrible, no matter what side you’re on. I would just like to see normalcy and civility. I’ve always loved the saying, “moderation in all things, including moderation.”
The procurement function plays a critical role within the Future of Work movement. This business unit, in addition to their typical, operational prowess in optimizing spend management and supply management, also holds responsibility for influencing extended and contingent workforce management and its many links to the ways enterprises drive value from their non-employee talent. Ardent Partners and the Future of Work Exchange, in partnership with Beeline and iValua, are excited to host an exclusive webcast tomorrow focused on the big trends and predictions that will shape 2024 for this crucial enterprise function.
Andrew Bartolini (Ardent’s Chief Research Officer), Brian Hoffmeyer (SVP of Market Strategies at Beeline), and Vishal Patel (iValua’s VP of Marketing) will join me for a spirited discussion on hot-button topics such as inflation, economic conditions, the talent wars, extended workforce growth, direct sourcing, and the 2024 impact of artificial intelligence on business operations. Join us tomorrow (Thursday, February 1) at 10am ET. You won’t want to miss this event!
Our “Talent Expert Series” on FOWX features podcast excerpts of today’s Future of Work thought leaders who appear on The Future of Work Exchange Podcast. The series kicks off with an excerpt from Season 7, Episode 12 featuring Kara Kaplan, CEO of High5, as she discusses a range of topics from the evolution of staffing to the growth in the extended enterprise to the next stage of direct sourcing.
Click to listen to the full interview. Note that this excerpt has been edited for readability.
Christopher Dwyer: Let’s begin with your general insights into the staffing industry, especially given your unique vantage point with High5. When you think of the evolution of staffing and the rise and continued growth of the extended workforce, where are we today?
Kara Kaplan: For starters, the evolution of staffing and the emergence of the extended workforce has ushered in this profound transformation that we’re seeing. It’s a fundamental shift in how companies view and engage with talent. The traditional employment model has been supplemented and, in some cases, supplanted by an extended workforce. Thus, you see many organizations today, if not most, embracing the extended workforce as an integral component of their talent strategy.
And when we look at the term “employee” in general, it’s really evolving with these new models. You have everything from full-time, part-time, contract, gig, remote, hybrid, shared and other terms emerging. Those organizations that rigidly stick to the traditional relationship are going to find themselves fighting an uphill battle. Conversely, enterprises that appreciate and use a mix of workforce models will ultimately be the ones that succeed and have access to more talent and better talent.
It’s more of an adaptation to the new global economy that we now live in and all the complexities and opportunities that are part and parcel of that global shift. At the end of the day, organizations need to embrace this evolution not as an option but more as a strategic imperative. The exciting thing is that organizations are starting to do that.
CD: There is definitely a talent revolution occurring and obviously companies like High 5 fit into that. However, how do you see companies like High5 and other digital staffing platforms fitting into this change in talent acquisition?
KK: Today’s talent revolution signifies a profound shift in how organizations acquire and engage talent. We’re seeing it become much more commoditized. Talent is more dynamic and diverse, as well as more digitally connected than ever before. With the rise of talent marketplaces and digital staffing solutions, they’ve been instrumental in reshaping talent acquisition strategies and truly enabling organizations to adapt and thrive in this global landscape.
At their core, talent marketplaces democratized new access to a global pool of talent. These platforms are empowering organizations to source talent with levels of speed and accuracy that were not possible just a short time ago. For example, in the recent past, when working with many staffing agencies, there was a significant amount of manual effort required in matching a worker with a shift — even if they had a robust ATS, it would only benefit them to a degree. However, today’s digital staffing solutions driven by artificial intelligence and automation have redefined the recruitment process and streamlined nearly everything from candidate sourcing to screening to onboarding and payrolling. It saves a vast amount of time and resources.
CD: In our industry when you think about digital staffing, what comes to mind is BMS, MSP, direct sourcing, total talent, workforce management technology, and artificial intelligence. AI has moved beyond hype and is generally accepted as table stakes in our industry. What are your views on AI and its impact?
KK: To your point, we can’t have this conversation without talking about generative AI and what it means. However, the idea that AI is table stakes for competitive differentiation may be overly simplistic. While AI can undoubtedly provide a significant edge, it’s not a cure-all as companies are seeing. Enterprises still have to remain focused on their core offerings and the human aspect of talent as well as customer relationships to build a sustainable competitive advantage. It’s certainly an exciting time for AI but also a scary one as well. AI is not going away and we’ll continue to hear frequently about the technology, but going forward we need to think about AI in the right way and in the smart way.
CD: Let’s pivot to direct sourcing which was gaining momentum even before the pandemic and is now another table-stakes strategy for businesses if they want to deepen their talent pool and scale their workforce. There’s so much more to direct sourcing than simply contingent recruitment process outsourcing (RPO). With that in mind, where do you see direct sourcing heading?
KK: So much has changed in just the year since I started High5. There’s no doubt that direct sourcing has emerged as a pivotal force in recruiting and is definitely here to stay. There are sessions at major conferences dedicated to direct sourcing with brands like Northern Trust, Toyota, and Meta espousing its benefits. When that starts to happen, the more prominence direct sourcing will have. Clearly, in terms of the future of direct sourcing, the benefits are there. However, its adoption will require an education process. Anytime an education process is involved, it’s going to slow things down, particularly from a sales cycle perspective, but that process plays a vital role in ensuring that organizations realize the efficacy of direct sourcing. To be successful means ensuring that best practices are being followed. When direct sourcing initiatives fail, it’s because they didn’t follow best practices. Again, I’m extremely bullish on the future of direct sourcing, but I do think it will take some time for that education to catch up.
CD: Before we wrap up, 2023 is quickly coming to an end. What do you see on the horizon in the year ahead?
KK: I wish I had a crystal ball. For us, 2024 is about strengthening our position in the market. Being known as the “tech first” company, we’re making heavy investments in our tech enablement, our marketplace, and our other platforms. We have a great deal of excitement around some of our recent tech acquisitions and the compelling value proposition that creates for us going forward.
Whether enterprises realize it or not, it is time to approach total talent management as an ecosystem value chain. Like supply chains, which are not linear segments but rather a spiderweb of inputs, the total talent ecosystem has a similar construct. With enterprise talent and strategy at the center hub, the various talent inputs such as FTEs, gig workers, contractors, and external talent serve as spokes that feed into organizational strategic objectives. As an ecosystem, it is about accessing the best talent from an arsenal of channels.
Using a sports analogy, enterprises now have a valuable “bench of players” from whom to select for various projects and initiatives. With total talent intelligence, organizations can tap employees with specific skillsets that may not be core to their current roles. Through the utilization of HR solutions, there should be transparency in the full depth that each employee brings to the enterprise.
Total Talent Management…Enabled By Today’s Tech
There are few reasons for enterprises not to have extended workforce systems to enable total talent intelligence and human capital systems integration. Research from Ardent Partners and the Future of Work Exchange indicate that 65% of businesses plan to utilize their workforce solutions to enable total talent intelligence over the next couple of years. And 90% have integration enabled between HR and contingent workforce systems (such as integration between HRIS and VMS platforms).
With extended workforce systems, organizations can achieve full transparency, management, and oversight of employees in all talent channels. Direct sourcing solutions bring even more capabilities through automation to build ever-growing talent communities to expand needed skillsets. Ultimately, enterprises want to achieve transparency in their ecosystem value chain where employees are looking beyond its four walls and into their larger contribution to suppliers and customers.
The Value Chain Mindset
The ecosystem value chain mindset can be advantageous with today’s focus on purpose-driven work. Knowing how they’re contributing to larger enterprise goals and objectives provides employees with a sense of purpose and accomplishment. Organizations have done a better job of showing workers how their roles stretch beyond their workspace and into broader operations.
However, it is now time to bring greater awareness to the value chain and the shifting approach to workforce intelligence and management. The competitive environment and volatile labor marketplace require an opening of the curtain so to speak and an unveiling of how the workforce (and all its channels) are unified in the larger operational scope. Doing so can lead to several advantages:
- Enhances talent engagement and acquisition. Workplace cultures are evolving as are leadership styles, which makes total talent management even more critical. How is the enterprise attracting new talent? What is the approach for total talent acquisition? Is the process centralized for increased visibility? Are there guidelines and processes for sourcing talent within all channels? The answers to these questions will affect overall talent engagement, acquisition, and retention.
- Transforms talent management to maximize the ecosystem value chain. The traditional approach of focusing primarily on permanent employees and their respective roles to achieve specific responsibilities lacks relevance in today’s Future of Work paradigm. Organizations require agility and flexibility to react to market changes and consumer demand. Those shifts don’t occur on their own. They are made by employees who must respond to new processes or with new skillsets. With a transformative talent ecosystem focused on a variety of channels to drive value chain competitiveness, organizations are better aligned for successful outcomes. It is essentially putting the enterprise in a position to have the right talent, at the right time, for the right need.
- Attracts the best talent through the promotion of a total talent strategy. As part of an organization’s total talent management strategy, promoting this approach to prospective employees can attract talent looking for purpose-driven roles. The opportunity to use unique skillsets outside of an employee’s core role is a recruitment tool that shouldn’t be overlooked. This is particularly true for contingent workers, whether they be contractors, gig workers, or other external talent. Often, these employees lack a sense of belonging and contribution to the greater enterprise. All channels of a talent ecosystem are equal in their support of the value chain. It is the skillsets, not the talent channel, that is the priority. Communicating this to potential talent and explaining how such a strategy is executed, could be transformative for recruitment as well.
A talent ecosystem with a holistic approach to value chain management and strategy is the next phase of total talent management. Leveling the playing field through talent channels ensures workforce and organizational stability.
In the realm of workforce management, the concept of direct sourcing has not escaped the fervor of its own hype machine. The question persists, though: what defines direct sourcing? What is its true “reality”? What “state” is direct sourcing in today, given the evolution of talent acquisition and extended workforce management?
There is no easy answer, unfortunately. The most interesting facet regarding direct sourcing is that the industry has not yet settled on a true definition; much like contingent workforce programs can be called such without a drop of automation or third-party support, direct sourcing often falls into the same spectrum. Even without a VMS, extended workforce platform, or MSP in place, businesses can state that their non-employee workforce programs are tried-and-true (and “end-to-end”) even in cases where additional attributes, particularly services procurement and SOW management, aren’t considered part of the overall initiative.
Misconceptions surrounding direct sourcing often center on the intricacies of its implementation and the true characterization of what qualifies as genuine “direct sourcing.” Does an enterprise curating its talent internally and channeling candidates into a talent pool truly embody direct sourcing as a core workforce strategy? To discern the essence of direct sourcing, we must explore its full spectrum, including segmentation, integration into primary recruitment streams, and the facilitation of talent nurture capabilities — which is where the question arises: is automation indispensable for it to be deemed a true, end-to-end program? Do enterprises require deeper talent technology stacks to ensure direct sourcing meets its potential as a talent acquisition gamechanger?
That question is a bit easier to answer. Event though direct sourcing stands apart as a workforce strategy that yields significant benefits even when its components are selectively harnessed, there is so much more value in the initiative when its fueled by next-level automation and an edge of talent acquisition transformation. While businesses prioritizing meticulous talent curation and the optimization of talent communities often find themselves equipped with top-tier candidates, particularly crucial in an era where experience and skillsets reign supreme, the truth is that the full potential of direct sourcing, especially in terms of talent nurture, referrals, and skills-based hiring, requires the incorporation of advanced capabilities facilitated by direct sourcing platforms, artificial intelligence (AI), and extended workforce automation.
Yet, challenges abound. Executive buy-in, functional collaboration, and recruitment disparities can impede the success of direct sourcing. It is crucial to recognize that talent curation alone is not a panacea, and merely applying direct sourcing-like processes to existing talent acquisition capabilities falls short. Enterprises must delve into the core motivations behind adopting direct sourcing and implement comprehensive measures for its end-to-end execution. Cost savings demand agile talent engagement and the seamless integration of talent pool/community candidates into existing recruitment streams, while an enhanced candidate experience necessitates placing AI and related technology at the forefront of every candidate journey, particularly in a mobile setting.
And, with skills-based hiring becoming a critical recruitment initiative for 2024, defining “direct sourcing” will entail converging multilayered strategies and solutions, along with progressive business thinking, into a seamless program that facilitates the next generation of hiring.
Happy New Year from the Future of Work Exchange! We’re so excited for what 2024 will hold for the Future of Work movement.
We return today with part two of our fractional executive series. In part one, we explored how the evolving workplace trend of fractional executives is a game-changer for businesses in need of C-level leadership expertise and insight.
Sharing their own experiences around this trend was John Healy, chief executive with Whrrr Work (formerly VP and managing director for Kelly), and Neha Goel, a fractional CMO with the Rippler Group (formerly CMO and VP of marketing for Utmost). Both return in part two where we look at when and how to engage a fractional executive.
As discussed in part one, a fractional executive serves as a flexible and on-demand approach to talent acquisition. Whether it’s a role such as a chief marketing officer (CMO) or chief procurement officer (CPO), businesses now have scalable talent options to execute critical programs and initiatives.
In part two, we’ll look at what to consider when choosing a fractional executive and how these leaders can best support businesses.
Fractional Doesn’t Mean Insignificant
Despite the term, a fractional executive leads, advises, and supports their client’s business with the same tenacity and resolve as a permanent member of the leadership team. In fact, without such expertise, a business may be facing failure. This is all the more reason why the selection process must be rigorous (check out CPO Rising’s decision tree “Do You Need a Fractional CPO”).
Businesses have several considerations when choosing a fractional executive, says Goel. She notes the specific expertise required, an executive’s track record or experience with similar companies, the scope and duration of the project, as well as the company’s budget. “It’s also important to define clear objectives and KPIs to ensure the engagement’s success,” adds Goel.
Healy couldn’t agree more. Holding a fractional executive accountable for agreed-upon results is essential. It’s what separates choosing a fractional leader versus an external consultant or advisor. “Whether engaged as a freelancer or as a part-time FTE or via an external service provider, both parties need to take the time to define and agree on expectations — even when one of those expectations is to develop answers to the unknown,” he says.
However, equally important, and sometimes overlooked, is the cultural fit between the executive and the existing leadership team, says Goel. Cultural fit, along with other criteria that are critical when making a permanent hiring decision, should carry the same weight when deciding on a fractional executive. The consequences are just as damaging.
Support From Within
You have decided to hire a fractional executive and identified the must-haves as part of the selection process, but how can this leader best be leveraged in your business? While many fractional executives work remotely, they understand the criticality of in-person leadership and engagement. Still, how can businesses best utilize fractional leaders during their assignments? What areas of support are most conducive for such leaders?
Goel provides a few areas where fractional leaders can deliver the most value:
- Providing strategic leadership. At the top of the list is strategic leadership, which is generally the impetus for engaging a C-level executive. However, ensure collaboration between a fractional executive and other members of the leadership team. Decision-making in a vacuum is not a valuable outcome.
- Driving key projects. Utilize the leader’s expertise to help determine strategic trajectories and projects to achieve objectives. Fractional executives should be the driving force behind key projects but not necessarily involved in the execution. Instead, they are monitoring progress, advising on implementation, and tracking performance.
- Transferring knowledge to the existing team. Most fractional leader assignments are short-term engagements. Thus, transferring knowledge to not only the leadership team but managers as well will be crucial for sustained growth and success. Knowledge is power. Imparting wisdom and sharing lessons learned should be an expectation of a fractional leader.
“They should act as catalysts for change and innovation, offering an external perspective and a network of contacts, while being adept at quickly understanding the company’s challenges and opportunities to create immediate value,” says Goel.
When Healy takes on an assignment, he finds helping a company develop a more intentional orchestration of its workforce ecosystem occurs through different actions and phases.
“There is a learning and development action that occurs in the first phase of an engagement, followed by an assessment of organizational maturity and readiness,” says Healy. “The action plan for deploying specific elements of the program is dependent on the client’s ability to take action and dedicate the time and resources to the effort — in each case, those are unique circumstances.”
“As a result, the trust and candor in the relationship are critical to ensuring expectations on both sides are met … we both gain value when an initiative is deployed and achieves the results desired, or when the initiative is stopped early in the process, saving time, effort, and expense for all involved,” adds Healy.
With only a couple of weeks until 2024, the demand for fractional executives will continue as uncertainty remains and more companies enter the marketplace. The Future of Work is about redefining the “traditional” and exploring new paradigms for workplace success. Fractional executives have found their place in that endeavor.
The Future of Work Exchange wishes our readers and community a Happy Thanksgiving! We’ll see you back here next week!